Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Isabel Cowles Murphy's avatar

A course on this piece and on the thinkers and writers you’ve mentioned should be required in every high school or college.

Expand full comment
Michael Running's avatar

Thank you so much, Satya. Framing how responding to the wound perpetuates the wounding (i.e. “Men are cut off from themselves, and so they are cut off from empathy, and so they choose violence, guns, weapons, and war on repeat. Over and over and over.”) is so helpful and validating. This morning, I read your fantastic post on the last day of an annual men’s weekend retreat I lead for a weekly men’s process group I run. Being with each other in our wounds with empathy, love, and connection, while restraining/shedding the impulse to deflect, minimize, fix, or even soothe (“it’s not that bad”) is much of the work in this group. I have seen these men grow more connected with their bodies and feelings, risking emotions and love toward themselves and others. And yet, the world (which shows up of course in group) tells them, shows them, again and again the dangers of risking vulnerability and authenticity with the assumption (the demand, even) of individual isolation. We are working slowly, collectively, to shift this story. I have Elise Loehnen’s interview with Gilligan cued up for the drive home today. Thank you.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts